dc.contributor.author |
Abong'o B, Yu X, Donnelly MJ, Geier M, Gibson G, Gimnig J, Ter Kuile F, Lobo NF, Ochomo E, Munga S, Ombok M, Samuels A, Torr SJ, Hawkes FM. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-08-16T12:10:31Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-08-16T12:10:31Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018-10 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13071-018-3099-7 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.kemri.go.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/941 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Background: As currently implemented, malaria vector surveillance in sub-Saharan
Africa targets endophagic and endophilic mosquitoes, leaving exophagic (outdoor bloodfeeding) mosquitoes underrepresented. We evaluated the recently developed host decoy
trap (HDT) and compared it to the gold standard, human landing catch (HLC), in a 3 × 3
Latin square study design outdoors in western Kenya. HLCs are considered to represent
the natural range of Anopheles biting-behaviour compared to other sampling tools, and
therefore, in principle, provide the most reliable profile of the biting population
transmitting malaria. The HDT incorporates the main host stimuli that attract blood-meal
seeking mosquitoes and can be baited with the odours of live hosts.
Results: Numbers and species diversity of trapped mosquitoes varied significantly
between HLCs and HDTs baited with human (HDT-H) or cattle (HDT-C) odour,
revealing important differences in behaviour of Anopheles species. In the main study in
Kisian, the HDT-C collected a nightly mean of 43.2 (95% CI: 26.7-69.8) Anopheles,
compared to 5.8 (95% CI: 4.1-8.2) in HLC, while HDT-H collected 0.97 (95% CI: 0.4-
2.1), significantly fewer than the HLC. Significantly higher proportions of An. arabiensis
were caught in HDT-Cs (0.94 ± 0.01; SE) and HDT-Hs (0.76 ± 0.09; SE) than in HLCs
(0.45 ± 0.05; SE) per trapping night. The proportion of An. gambiae (s.s.) was highest in
HLC (0.55 ± 0.05; SE) followed by HDT-H (0.20 ± 0.09; SE) and least in HDT-C (0.06
± 0.01; SE). An unbaited HDT placed beside locales where cattle are usually corralled
overnight caught mostly An. arabiensis with proportions of 0.97 ± 0.02 and 0.80 ± 0.2
relative to the total anopheline catch in the presence and absence of cattle, respectively.
A mean of 10.4 (95% CI: 2.0-55.0) Anopheles/night were trapped near cattle, compared
to 0.4 (95% CI: 0.1-1.7) in unbaited HDT away from hosts.
Conclusions: The capability of HDTs to combine host odours, heat and visual stimuli to
simulate a host provides the basis of a system to sample human- and cattle-biting
mosquitoes. HDT-C is particularly effective for collecting An. arabiensis outdoors. The
HDT offers the prospect of a system to monitor and potentially control An. arabiensis
and other outdoor-biting mosquitoes more effectively. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Parasit Vectors |
en_US |
dc.title |
Host Decoy Trap (HDT) with cattle odour is highly effective for collection of exophagic malaria vectors. |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |