dc.contributor.author |
Jost J, Ratsimbazafy V, Nguyen TT, Nguyen TL, Dufat H, Dugay A, Ba A,Sivadier G, Mafilaza Y, Jousse C, Traïkia M, Leremboure M, Auditeau E, Raharivelo A, Ngoungou E, Kariuki SM, Newton CR, Preux PM. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-08-12T09:45:23Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-08-12T09:45:23Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018-07 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.14445. |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.kemri.go.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/904 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Objective: Epilepsy is a major public health issue in low- and middle-income countries,
where the availability and accessibility of quality treatment remain important issues, the
severity of which may be aggravated by poor quality antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The
primary objective of this study was to measure the quality of AEDs in rural and urban
areas in 3 African countries.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in Gabon, Kenya, and Madagascar.
Both official and unofficial supply chains in urban and rural areas were investigated.
Samples of oral AEDs were collected in areas where a patient could buy or obtain them.
Pharmacological analytical procedures and Medicine Quality Assessment Reporting
Guidelines were used to assess quality.
Results: In total, 102 batches, representing 3782 units of AEDs, were sampled. Overall,
32.3% of the tablets were of poor quality, but no significant difference was observed
across sites: 26.5% in Gabon, 37.0% in Kenya, and 34.1% in Madagascar (P = .7). The
highest proportions of substandard medications were found in the carbamazepine
(38.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.8-57.8) and phenytoin (83.3%; 95% CI 35.8-
99.5) batches, which were mainly flawed by their failure to dissolve. Sodium valproate
was the AED with the poorest quality (32.1%; 95% CI 15.8-42.3). The phenobarbital
(94.1%; 95% CI 80.3-99.2) and diazepam (100.0%) batches were of better quality. The
prevalence of substandard quality medications increased in samples supplied by public
facilities (odds ratio [OR] 9.9; 95% CI 1.2-84.1; P < .04) and manufacturers located in
China (OR 119.8; 95% CI 8.7-1651.9; P < .001). The prevalence of AEDs of bad quality
increased when they were stored improperly (OR 5.4; 95% CI 1.2-24.1; P < .03).
Significance: No counterfeiting was observed. However, inadequate AED storage
conditions are likely to lead to ineffective and possibly dangerous AEDs, even when
good-quality AEDs are initially imported. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Epilepsia |
en_US |
dc.title |
. Quality of antiepileptic drugs in sub-Saharan Africa: A study in Gabon, Kenya, and Madagascar. |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |