Abstract:
Globally, 830 women die daily of preventable pregnancy-related complications; 90%
of these mortalities are from developing countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Mitigating
against these deaths continue to be a challenge especially in developing countries
Kenya included where only a few countries have implemented the Abuja declaration
to allocate at least 15% of the national budget to their health sector. Despite this, the
Kenya government adopted universal health care for maternity services in 2013 to
reduce the Maternal Mortality Rate (MMR) which was then at 488/100,000 live
births. Despite continuous variation in scope of “free maternity” care, it has not been
established whether there are differences in perinatal outcomes at public health
facilities that offer free maternity services against those at non-public health facilities
that charge for services. The study sought to determine client-level factors, facility level factors and the relationship between client and facility level factors that affect
perinatal outcomes among women attending public and non public health facilities in
Kisii County. The study used a prospective cohort approach at comparable level 4
facilities in Kisii County including two public (Oresi Health Centre and Kenyenya
Hospital) and two non-public (Christamarrianne-CMMH and Tabaka Mission
Hospitals). At the start of the study, 365 mothers were recruited through stratified
sampling for follow up from 16 weeks gestation until 2 weeks post delivery. By the
end of the study, 287 mothers (187 from public and 100 from non-public facilities)
had been followed up to 2 weeks after delivery. Mothers lost to follow-up after first
visit were not included in data analysis. At baseline socio-demographic and targeted
study variables were measured, at the 2nd and 3rd follow up visits, targeted study
variables were monitored. Chi-square tests were used to determine differences
between client/facility factors and perinatal outcomes; Paired t and McNemar’s tests
were used to compare relative means of different factors at different ANC visits for
parametric and non-parametric data respectively while Logistic Regression tests were
used to measure odds of a normal or abnormal perinatal outcome versus specific
study indicators. At the end of the follow-up 31/287 women (11% cumulative
incidence in a period of 6 months) developed abnormal perinatal outcomes such preterm deliveries, obstructed labour and miscarriages among others. Overall, no
xix
statistically significant differences were noted in perinatal outcomes between public
and non-public facilities. However, higher maternal BMI was significantly associated
with abnormal perinatal outcome (χ
2= 8.900, d.f =3, p=0.031) while higher parity
was associated with normal perinatal outcome (χ
2= 13.232, d.f =4, p=0.039). A
significant relationship existed between a mother’s knowledge of pregnancy related
issues and the baby’s weight (t=-67.8 d.f. 213 p<0.001). Mothers who were
accompanied by their spouses at each visit to the ANC clinic had a 26% higher
chance of normal delivery compared to mothers who were unaccompanied for all the
3 ANC visits (OR 0.26 95% CI 0.08-0.792 p=0.02). Individuals who delivered at
facilities with low midwife-client ratio had a 5% higher likelihood of having a
normal perinatal outcome as compared to those delivering in facilities with high
midwives staffing ratios (OR=0.05, 95% CI 0.046-0.055, p=0.006). The study
concluded that perinatal outcomes were not different at either public or non-public
facilities. The perinatal outcomes between individuals who paid and those who did
not pay for ANC services either at the public or non-public health facilities were not
different.The study recommends that under free maternity care settings, health
education of mothers, male involvement and staffing of facilities with more skilled
midwives needs to be strengthened for better perinatal outcomes to be increased.