Abstract:
The incidence of unsafe abortion has been on the rise over the last 10 years with Kenya
reporting one of the highest rates of unsafe abortions in sub-Saharan Africa region. Due
to controversy about abortion, anyone associated with abortion faces stigma in one way
or another. This study investigated the association between abortion related stigma and
unsafe abortions and factors associated with abortion-related stigma among individual
women seeking abortion services and among general community members in Machakos
and Trans Nzoia counties in Kenya. Specifically, the study was guided by the following
objectives; to determine the level of abortion-related stigma among individual women
receiving abortion care services and among general community members, establish
association between abortion-related stigma and incidence of unsafe abortion and,
examine factors associated with abortion-related stigma at personal and community level.
The study adopted a mixed method cross sectional design comprising quantitative and
qualitative methods. The target population was men and women of reproductive age (16
– 49 years) in the two counties. Multi-stage sampling method was used to sample
respondents. At community level, out of 712 respondents were targeted in various
categories, 712 respondents were received as valid representing 100% response rate. At
the facility level, out of 762 women treated for abortion complications in selected facilities
in the two counties, 759 respondents were received as valid, representing a respone rate
of 99.6%. For qualitative methods, a total of 26 Focus group discussions was held and 26
indepth interviews held after reaching a point of saturation in both counties. Survey data
from quantitative methods was collected by use of two separate structured questionnaires
one at community level and the other at individual level. The questionnaires were pilot
tested on 20 respondents drawn from the study sites. Reliability of the questions was done
by use of Cronbach’s alpha. Normality test was done for dependent variable to aid
subsequent regression analysis. For qualitative methods, indepth interview guides and
focus group guides were developed and piloted in two communities and changes on order
of questions made. A thematic framework analysis was used. A code book comprising
both deductive and inductive codes and their definitions was created. The transcripts from
xv
all the IDIs and FGDs were then separately uploaded onto Atlas –ti version 7 software to
code the data. IDI and FGD transcripts were analysed by first reading the interviews,
familiarising with the data and noting the themes and concepts that emerged. This study
established a relationship between incidence of unsafe abortions and levels of abortion
stigma where respondents from a county with higher incidence of unsafe abortion reported
higher stigma scores compared to those from a county with lower incidence of unsafe
abortion. The study revealed that stigma was in form of self-stigma, from the community
and from health providers. Due to stigma, women preferred to seek information on
abortion only from trusted friends and close relatives, regardless of their reliability to keep
their abortion confidential. Based on the study findings it can be concluded that abortion
related stigma is a key contributor to unsafe abortion in Kenya. The study recommends
that stigma reduction interventions require multidimensional approaches targeting players
at all levels. The study makes significant contribution to the body of knowledge in that
organizations focusing on addressing reducing maternal deaths will gain practical insights
into abortion stigma as a main contributor to deaths that could be prevented by
normalizing converations around abortion thereby enriching their knowledge on stigma
reduction interventions. Future researchers may focus on individual and community
knowledge and actions as it relates to how women seeking abortions will be treated by
their community members exposed to abortion stigma reduction interventions.