Abstract:
re-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective in prevention of Human
Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infections among populations at a substantial risk.
Approximately 39 million HIV related mortalities have been recorded to date and
over 2 million people contract HIV annually, while HIV rate among FSWs estimated
to be about 12% globally. World Health Organization (WHO) recommended use of
PrEP for HIV prevention in 2012 and by 2020, over 930,000 people worldwide had
been initiated on PrEP. However, risk compensation among Female Sex Workers
(FSWs) raises concerns about increased risk of sexually transmitted Infections
(STIs). While STIs screening is continually done at every PrEP refill visits and cases
treated, increased risk of STIs may reduce the prevention benefits of PrEP while
increasing STI rates with ultimate impact on economic and health burdens. This
study investigated the effects of HIV oral PrEP on the incidences of STIs and risky
sexual behaviors among female sex workers in Nairobi. A six months retrospective
cohort study was conducted among FSWs comprising of both HIV oral PrEP users
and non-PrEP users accessing services at selected Drop-in Centers (DICEs) in
Nairobi County. Multi stage sampling was employed to select Sub Counties, DICEs
and participants, to generate a sample size of 168 PrEP users and 168 non-PrEP
users. A structured data abstraction tool was used to collect the desired data on STI
incidences, condom use and average sexual acts. This data was abstracted from the
participant records as documented during monthly routine data collection. Data was
analyzed using STATA. Oral PrEP users were found to be 1.8 times at increased risk
of STIs (P=0.005, 95%CI) than non-PrEP users. Vaginitis (62%) and cervicitis
(21%) were the most common STIs identified among FSWs with a composite STI
prevalence of 35.4% and pooled STI incidence rate of 14 per 1000 person years. The
average number of sexual acts per day was significantly higher among oral PrEP
users than non-PrEP users from month two to month six with a 1.0-unit increase in
mean sexual acts among PrEP users (P=.004, 95%CI). PrEP users were at increased
risk of STIs than non-PrEP users with hazard ratio of 1.82 (P=.005, 95%CI) and
relative risk (RR) of 1.4 (P=.012, 95%CI). There was no significant difference in
mean condom use between PrEP users and non-users from month one to month five,
but a statistically significant difference in mean condom use at month six, 4.3 and 5.0
PrEP and non-PrEP use respectively (P=0.05, 95%CI). There was a 0.38 mean
reduction in condom use among PrEP users, but statistically insignificant (P=.179,
95%CI). This study has demonstrated that: Vaginitis, cervicitis and Pelvic
Inflammatory Disease (PID) are the most prevalent STIs among FSWs; PrEP use
among FSWs increases likelihood of higher daily sexual acts suggestive of
behavioral risk compensation; Use of oral PrEP for HIV prevention increases the risk
of STIs among FSWs using oral PrEP; and PrEP use does not influence condom use
among FSWs. Prevention counseling should be emphasized during PrEP initiation
and throughout PrEP follow up visits