Comparative performance of the InBios SCoV-2 Detect (TM) IgG ELISA and the in-house KWTRP ELISA in detecting SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibodies in Kenyan populations

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bernadette Kutima , Eunice Wageci Kagucia , Kennedy Mwai , Makobu Kimani, Antipa Sigilai, Daisy Mugo , Henry Karanja, John N Gitonga , Angela Karani , Donald Akech , Monica Toroitich , Boniface Karia , James Tuju , Abdhalah K Ziraba , Godfrey Bigogo , Caroline Ochieng , Clayton Onyango , Shirley Lidechi , Patrick K Munywoki , Sophie Uyoga , Ifedayo M O Adetifa , Lynette I Ochola Oyier , Philip Bejon , J Anthony G Scott , Ambrose Agweyu , George M Warimwe , James Nyagwange ; Kenya SARS-CoV-2 Serology Consortium
dc.date.accessioned 2026-03-27T08:49:06Z
dc.date.available 2026-03-27T08:49:06Z
dc.date.issued 2025-07
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20240.2
dc.identifier.uri
dc.description.abstract Background: The InBios SCoV-2 Detect™ IgG ELISA (InBios) and the in-house KWTRP ELISA (KWTRP) have both been used in the estimation of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Kenya. Whereas the latter has been validated extensively using local samples, the former has not. Such validation is important for informing the comparability of data across the sites and populations where seroprevalence has been reported. Methods: We compared the assays directly using pre-pandemic serum/plasma collected in 2018 from 454 blood donors and 173 malaria cross-sectional survey participants, designated gold standard negatives. As gold standard SARS-CoV-2 positive samples: we assayed serum/plasma from 159 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive patients and 166 vaccination-confirmed participants. Results: The overall agreement on correctly classified samples was >0.87 for both assays. The overall specificity was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.87-0.91) for InBios and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99) for KWTRP among the gold standard negative samples while the overall sensitivity was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90- 0.95) for InBios and KWTRP ELISAs respectively, among the gold standard positive samples. In all, the positive predictive value for InBios was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.87) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99) for KWTRP while the negative predictive value was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97- 0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98) for InBios and KWTRP respectively. Conclusions: Overall, both assays showed sufficient sensitivity and specificity to estimate SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in different populations in Kenya. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Wellcome Open Res en_US
dc.subject IgG; Immunoassay; SARS-CoV-2; Serology; Total immunoglobulin en_US
dc.title Comparative performance of the InBios SCoV-2 Detect (TM) IgG ELISA and the in-house KWTRP ELISA in detecting SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibodies in Kenyan populations en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account