Abstract:
Introduction: viral load (VL) monitoring is a critical
component of HIV management, yet systemic and
logistical barriers compromise the quality and
reliability of VL sample management in many lowand middle-income countries. In Machakos County,
Kenya, these challenges persist, contributing to a
relatively low viral suppression rate of 81% and
achievement of UNAIDS 95-95-95 strategy. This
study determined barriers to effective VL sample
management in Machakos County, Kenya, with a
focus on equipment maintenance, human resource
capacity, and supply chain performance across
public and private facilities. Methods: a
convergent parallel mixed-methods design was
employed across 71 health facilities (61 public, 10
private) served by four VL hubs: Machakos Level 5,
Matuu Level 4, Athi River Level 4, and Kangundo
Level 4 hospitals. Quantitative data was collected
from 205 healthcare workers using structured
questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, Fisher’ s
Exact Test, and Odds Ratios (OR) with 95%
Confidence Intervals (CI) assessed associations
between barriers and sample management
outcomes. Qualitative data was obtained through
38 key informant interviews with clinicians from
Comprehensive Care Clinics and Maternal and
Child Health units (public n=32, private n=6).
Transcripts were thematically analyzed using
Braun and Clarke’s framework, and a word cloud
visualized common terms. Findings were
triangulated for contextual depth. Ethical approval
was obtained from the Kenya Medical Research
Institute- Scientific Ethics Review Unit, with
clearance from the Machakos County Department
of Health. Informed consent was obtained
and confidentiality were strictly maintained.
Results: among the VL hubs assessed, 88.8%
reported having a designated VL focal person, and
73.2% indicated that couriers had received some
form of training. Despite these structural
provisions, critical technical gaps persisted. Only
6.8% of facilities had calibrated centrifuges, 2.4%
conducted preventive maintenance, and 2.4%
calibrated their temperature monitoring devicespointing to widespread neglect of equipment
quality assurance protocols. Further, 58.5% of
facilities reported incidents of sample freezing,
often attributable to inconsistent cold chain
practices. These deficits were not isolated but
interrelated, collectively undermining the integrity
of VL sample handling. Bivariate analysis revealed
statistically significant associations between
effective sample management and calibrated
temperature devices (OR: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.6-7.0; p =
0.01), absence of sample freezing (OR: 2.8; 95% CI:
1.3-6.2; p= 0.03), and trained couriers (OR: 1.5;
95% CI: 0.9-2.7; p= 0.06), accentuating the
importance of technical reliability alongside
human resource readiness. The VL hubs with
preventive maintenance showed significantly
higher odds of effective sample management (OR:
4.5; 95% CI: 2.0-10.1; p< 0.001). Only 5.4% of
facilities reported consistent availability of VL
collection materials. Qualitative insights
highlighted sporadic equipment servicing,
recurrent stockouts, and poor coordination
between facility-level operations and county
logistics. Conclusion: persistent systemic barrierssuch as inadequate equipment maintenance and
fragmented supply chain management-undermine
the effectiveness of VL sample management in
Machakos County. Strengthening technical quality
protocols, institutionalizing regular equipment
maintenance, and enhancing supply chain
coordination through the National AIDS and STI
Control Program (NASCOP) and county health
departments are critical to improving diagnostic
reliability and advancing Kenya’s HIV viral
suppression targets.