Uptake and acceptability of oral HIV self-testing in the context of assisted partner services in Western Kenya: A mixed-methods analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Victor Mudhune
dc.contributor.author Unmesha Roy Paladhi
dc.contributor.author Mercy Owuor
dc.contributor.author Kenneth Ngure
dc.contributor.author David A Katz
dc.contributor.author George Otieno
dc.contributor.author Monisha Sharma
dc.contributor.author Sarah Masyuko
dc.contributor.author Edward Kariithi
dc.contributor.author Carey Farquhar
dc.contributor.author Rose Bosire
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-01T09:00:00Z
dc.date.available 2025-10-01T09:00:00Z
dc.date.issued 2024-11-15
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003960
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.kemri.go.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1593
dc.description.abstract Integrating HIV self-testing (HIVST) into assisted partner services (APS) has potential to increase identification of people with HIV in the community, but little is known about acceptability of HIVST among partners traced via APS. We assessed characteristics of APS partners testing with HIVST, and factors influencing HIVST uptake and acceptability in a clusterrandomized control trial on APS+HIVST. Using convergent parallel mixed-methods design, we evaluated socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics of APS partners who were offered HIVST or provider-delivered testing, and purposively selected a sub-set of partners for in-depth interviews (IDIs). Descriptive and log-binomial regression analyses were performed controlling for health facility clusters, while IDIs were thematically analyzed applying the theoretical framework of acceptability. Among 3312 partners who were offered HIVST or provider-administered testing through APS, 2724 (82.2%) used HIVST. There was no association between partner demographics and HIVST uptake. HIVST use was less likely than provider-delivered testing among those identified as a casual (adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 0.93; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.88–0.98) or transactional (aRR = 0.90; 95% CI 0.87– 0.94) partner compared to those in a defined relationship. HIVST use was slightly lower among those offered the option of an additional kit when compared to those only offered one kit (aRR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.88–0.98). In the IDIs (N = 24), partners reported that HIVST was a viable option for individuals who do not find provider-delivered testing suitable or convenient. For the APS partners, ‘intervention coherence’, ‘self-efficacy’, and ‘ethicality’ presented as most significant theoretical framework of acceptability constructs. APS providers played a critical role in creating HIVST awareness and driving acceptability. Increasing HIVST awareness and providing tailored solutions will empower APS clients optimize their HIV testing decisions. Providers should consider context of the partner’s sexual encounter and extend counselling support when recommending HIVST within APS. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher PLOS Glob Public Health en_US
dc.subject Integrating HIV Self-Testing, HIVST, Assisted Partner Services, People with HIV, Partners Traced Via APS, HIVST Uptake en_US
dc.title Uptake and acceptability of oral HIV self-testing in the context of assisted partner services in Western Kenya: A mixed-methods analysis en_US
dc.type Learning Object en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Journals and Articles
    This is a collection of journals published by KEMRI Graduate School students, fulll access to the article can be access through the link provided.

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account